El verdadero Drácula y su sangriento reinado en Valaquia

El real Dracula is far more complex and terrifying than the cape-wearing count of fiction, who is purely a product of 19th-century gothic horror.

The historical figure behind the legend was Vlad III, a 15th-century prince, or Voivode, of Wallachia. His life was not defined by supernatural cravings, but by a brutal, relentless quest for power and independence.

Understanding this man means peeling back layers of myth, propaganda, and nationalist pride.

His bloody reign was forged in an era of constant warfare, political betrayal, and the existential threat of an overwhelming empire. This is the story of the man, the ruler, and the warrior.

In This Article

• Who Was the Real Dracula?
• Why Was He Called “Dracula”?
• What Was 15th-Century Wallachia Like?
• How Did Vlad III Consolidate His Power?
• What Sparked His Infamous War with the Ottoman Empire?
• What Is the Truth Behind the “Forest of the Impaled”?
• How Did the Man Become a Monster in Legend?
• What Is the Final Legacy of Vlad III?

Who Was the Real Dracula?

El real Dracula was born as Vlad III in 1431 in Sighișoara, Transylvania, which was then part of the Kingdom of Hungary.

He was the second legitimate son of Vlad II, the ruler of Wallachia, a neighboring principality located south of Transylvania (in modern-day Romania).

His early life was anything but stable. To secure his father’s fragile alliance with the Ottoman Empire, Vlad and his younger brother, Radu, were sent to the Ottoman court in 1442.

They lived as political hostages for several years under Sultan Murad II.

This period was deeply formative. Vlad witnessed the peak of Ottoman power and learned their military tactics.

It also likely fostered his deep-seated hatred for the Ottomans and his own internal rivals, the treacherous Boyars (nobles).

Why Was He Called “Dracula”?

The name “Dracula” itself is not a fabrication; it is a title. In 1431, Vlad’s father, Vlad II, was inducted into the Order of the Dragon.

This was a chivalric order founded by Sigismund of Luxembourg (then King of Hungary) to defend Christianity against the advancing Ottoman Empire.

His induction earned Vlad II the moniker Dracul, which derived from the Old Romanian word for dragon. Consequently, his son, Vlad III, became known as Dracula, which literally means “Son of the Dragon.”

However, in modern Romanian, the word drac has also taken on the meaning of “devil.” This linguistic coincidence heavily influenced later propaganda, perfectly painting Vlad as a demonic figure.

El real Dracula was thus linked to satanic imagery long before vampires entered the story.

+ La cultura underground de los músicos "hazlo tú mismo" en Europa del Este

What Was 15th-Century Wallachia Like?

To grasp Vlad III’s actions, one must first understand his world. Wallachia was a volatile buffer state, a “crossroads of empires.”

It was precariously trapped between two superpowers: the Kingdom of Hungary to the north and the expansionist Ottoman Empire to the south.

The region was in constant turmoil. Internally, Wallachia was plagued by factionalism. The Boyars, the landed aristocracy, constantly vied for control.

They frequently switched allegiances, assassinating or deposing princes who challenged their influence.

Vlad III’s own father, Vlad II, and older brother were brutally murdered in 1447, likely betrayed by Boyars allied with Hungary.

When Vlad III finally claimed his ancestral throne in 1456 (after a brief attempt in 1448), he inherited a fractured, ungovernable land.

+ La batalla secreta de la Segunda Guerra Mundial librada con tanques inflables

How Did Vlad III Consolidate His Power?

Vlad III knew he could not rule, nor defend his country, with a disloyal nobility at his back. His response was immediate, calculated, and utterly ruthless.

He initiated a campaign of terror to centralize power and eradicate all internal opposition.

His primary targets were the Boyars who had grown rich and powerful by undermining his predecessors.

A famous, though possibly apocryphal, story illustrates his methods. He reportedly invited hundreds of nobles to an Easter feast in his capital of Târgoviște.

After the meal, he allegedly had the older nobles and their families rounded up and impaled on the spot.

He forced the younger, healthier survivors into slave labor, marching them to build his stronghold, Poenari Castle, in the mountains.

He replaced the old aristocracy with men of lower birth, knights, and free peasants, creating a new, loyal power base.

El real Dracula was, above all, a systematic state-builder who used fear as his primary tool of governance.

+ La hipótesis del tiempo fantasma: ¿Nunca ocurrieron 300 años?

What Sparked His Infamous War with the Ottoman Empire?

For the first few years of his main reign, Vlad maintained a tense peace with the Ottomans, even paying the traditional jizya (tribute).

However, his ultimate goal was Wallachian independence. By 1459, he felt secure enough to defy the Sultan.

The breaking point came in 1461 when Sultan Mehmed II, the recent conqueror of Constantinople, demanded Vlad pay a delayed tribute and send 500 Wallachian boys to be trained as Janissaries. Vlad III flatly refused.

When Mehmed II sent envoys to enforce the demand, Vlad had them captured. According to some accounts, he had their turbans nailed to their heads because they refused to remove them in his presence, citing religious custom.

He then launched a preemptive, devastating campaign south of the Danube into Ottoman territory during the winter of 1461-1462.

He burned villages and slaughtered tens of thousands, signaling an open declaration of war against the world’s strongest army.

What Is the Truth Behind the “Forest of the Impaled”?

Vlad’s defiance enraged Mehmed II. In the spring of 1462, the Sultan amassed a colossal army, numbering as many as 90,000 soldiers and 120 cannons, and marched on Wallachia.

Vlad, by contrast, could only muster a force of around 30,000.

Unable to win a conventional battle, Vlad III employed scorched-earth tactics and relentless guerrilla warfare.

He poisoned wells, burned his own villages to deny the enemy supplies, and launched daring night raids, even attempting to assassinate the Sultan in his own tent.

His most horrifying act of psychological warfare awaited the Ottoman army as it approached Târgoviște. There, Mehmed II discovered what became known as the “Forest of the Impaled.”

Vlad had used his Ottoman prisoners, along with disloyal Boyars, to create a gruesome spectacle. An estimated 20,000 impaled corpses, including men, women, and children, were arranged in concentric circles on tall stakes, stretching for miles.

The sight was so stomach-turning that the battle-hardened Mehmed II, recognizing the sheer ferocity of his opponent, reportedly declared his admiration for such brutal statecraft.

El real Dracula had used terror to break the morale of an “unbeatable” army. Though Mehmed II eventually forced Vlad to flee, the campaign was costly and the “Forest” became legendary.

Key Events in the Life of Vlad III

How Did the Man Become a Monster in Legend?

The grotesque reputation of the real Dracula began long before any novels were written. His atrocities were well-documented at the time.

Crucially, his enemies used his own tactics against him, but with printing presses instead of stakes.

German pamphlets, printed in the 1480s and 1490s, circulated wildly across Europe.

These were sensationalized, biased accounts, likely funded by Transylvanian Saxon merchants who despised Vlad for harming their trade privileges.

They depicted him as an inhuman psychopath, boiling victims alive and dining among the dead.

These stories cemented his image in Western Europe as a bloodthirsty tyrant. While many of the stories were exaggerated, they were based on his known, documented cruelty.

He was, without question, a brutal man.

Over 400 years later, in 1897, the Irish author Bram Stoker was researching Eastern European folklore.

He stumbled upon the name “Dracula” and accounts of Wallachia. Stoker borrowed the evocative name and the region’s grim reputation, merging them with vampire myths to create his iconic novel.

El real Dracula, Vlad III, had no connection to vampirism. He was not known to drink blood, nor did he live in Transylvania (though he was born there).

Stoker simply crafted a masterpiece of fiction, and the historical prince was lost to the shadow of the count.

For more on the historical records, explore the British Library’s collection on Slavic and Eastern European history.

What Is the Final Legacy of Vlad III?

The legacy of Vlad III is deeply divided. In the West, thanks to Stoker and the German pamphlets, his name is synonymous with evil and the supernatural. He is the archetypal monster.

In modern Romania, however, his legacy is far more complex. While his methods are not celebrated, the real Dracula is often viewed as a national hero. He is remembered as a “founding father” type figure.

He was a fierce defender of Wallachian independence against overwhelming odds. He was a “strongman” ruler who brought order to a chaotic state by eradicating corruption among the nobility. He stood up to the Ottoman Empire when most of

Europe cowered.

Vlad III Țepeș was a man of his time—a brutal, medieval warlord ruling a violent land. His methods were barbaric, but his goals were political: security, stability, and sovereignty.

The fictional vampire may be immortal, but the real Dracula left a bloody, permanent mark on history.

Preguntas frecuentes (FAQ)

Q1: Where did the real Dracula live?

A: The real Dracula, Vlad III, primarily lived in Wallachia (a region in modern-day Romania). His capital was Târgoviște. He also built and resided in Poenari Castle. He did not live in the fictional “Castle Dracula” in Transylvania, although he was born in the Transylvanian city of Sighișoara.

Q2: Did Vlad the Impaler actually drink blood?

A: No. There is zero historical evidence to suggest Vlad III drank human blood. This element is pure fiction, originating from folklore and Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel. His reputation for cruelty came from his use of impalement, not vampirism.

Q3: How did Vlad III die?

A: The exact details of his death are unclear, but historians agree he died in battle in late 1476 or early 1477. After being released from Hungarian prison, he regained the throne of Wallachia for a third time. He was killed fighting an Ottoman army and their Wallachian allies near Bucharest. His head was reportedly cut off and sent to Sultan Mehmed II in Constantinople as proof of his death.

Q4: Was Vlad III considered evil in his own time?

A: He was feared by his enemies and subjects alike. His rivals, particularly the Transylvanian Saxons and the Ottomans, certainly depicted him as a demonic tyrant, circulating propaganda to that effect. However, his Wallachian supporters and peasantry likely saw him as a harsh but effective protector and a bringer of order.